|
Nursing
Matters fact
sheets provide quick reference information and international
perspectives from the nursing profession on current
health and social issues.
|
ICN on Preventing Needlestick
Injuries
Facts and Issues
At least one in eight health care workers receives a needlestick
injury potentially exposing them to serious or fatal infections
| Accidental needlestick injuries
are the predominant sharps-related problem in industrialized
countries. American health workers suffer 800,000 to 1 million
needlesticks annually, not including the vast number that go
unreported. There are more than 100,000 needlestick injuries
in UK hospitals each year. Needlesticks are virtually undocumented
in developing countries, but probably equal or exceed those
in the industrial world. More than 20 blood borne diseases
can be transmitted as a result of exposure to blood. Inadequate
waste disposal systems extend the problem beyond health workers
to cleaners, laundry workers, porters, 'rag pickers' and the
general community2. |
This is
a true scenario.
How can it be prevented?
An AIDS patient became agitated
and tried to remove the intravenous catheters. Hospital
staff struggled to restrain the patient. During the struggle,
an IV infusion line was pulled, exposing the connector
needle. A nurse recovered the connector needle at the
end of the IV line and attempted to reinsert it. The
patient kicked her arm, pushing the needle into the hand
of the second nurse. Three months later, the nurse who
sustained the needlestick injury tested positive for
HIV1.
|
In some countries, health care providers feel
obliged to give injections to satisfy their clients` perceptions
of proper treatment. Three studies in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia
found that between 60 and 80% of all injections given were unnecessary
and sometimes dangerous. The most frequently injected medications
were antibiotics2.
Impact on nurses
Nurses have the highest rate of needlestick injury among health care workers.
A health worker's risk of infection from a needlestick injury depends
on the pathogen involved, the immune status of the worker, and the severity
of the needlestick. The probability that a single needlestick will
result in disease is 3 to 5 chances in 1 000 for HIV, 300 chances in
1 000 for Hepatitis B, and 20 to 50 chances in 1 000 for Hepatitis C.
Accidental needlesticks account for 86% of all
occupationally related infectious disease transmission. The emotional
impact of a needlestick injury can be severe, even when a serious
infection is not transmitted, particularly when the injury
involves exposure to HIV. In one study of 20 health care workers with an
HIV exposure, 11 reported acute severe distress, 7 had persistent moderate
distress, and 6 quit their jobs as a result of their exposure3.
The economics of needlestick
injuries
According to the American Hospital Association, one case of serious infection
by bloodborne pathogens can result in $1 million of employer costs related
to testing, follow-up, lost time and disability payments. The cost of follow-up
for a high-risk exposure is almost $3 000 per needle stick injury even when
no infection occurs. Safe needle devices cost only 28¢ more than standard
devices. Hospitals in California are expected to save over $100 million per
year after implementing legislation requiring safe needle devices4.
Nurses` Rights
According to the International Labour Organization (ILO) all appropriate
measures should be taken to prevent, reduce or eliminate risks to the
health of nursing personnel. This includes5: