BACKGROUND
In early 1994, nurses from 10 countries in the Americas and Africa
met in Tlaxcala, Mexico to consider proposals for the development of
an informational tool to support community-based (CB) nursing programmes
and primary health care (PHC) nursing systems. The meeting was organised
by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) and funded by the W. K.
Kellogg Foundation. This meeting was seen to be an important step in
the ICN International Classification for Nursing Practice Project that
had been initiated in 1991 by ICN.
Towards the end of the 1980's, nurses in many countries were voicing
concern about their inability to name the problems or situations nursing
deals with. They expressed the difficulties they have in finding a
commonly recognised language to describe nursing's distinctive contributions
to solving, alleviating and preventing health problems or to promoting
healthy living. Current widely used international classifications such
as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) of the World
Health Organisation (WHO) and its family of classifications identified
few labels that may be applied to nursing's contribution to health
care.
The necessity for nursing to develop an International Classification
for Nursing Practice (ICNP® ) was
first proposed 1989 at ICN's Council of National Representatives
in a resolution calling for ICN to encourage member national nurses'
associations (NNAs) to become involved in developing classification
systems for nursing care, nursing information management systems
and nursing data sets in order to provide tools that nurses in all
countries could use to identify nursing practice, and describe nursing
and its contributions to health. In response to the resolution ICN
initiated work on the development of an ICNP® .
No group is doing this work at an international level. ICN, given
its worldwide network of member associations and other nursing groups,
is in a good position to undertake this task. Consequently, ICN has
made a long-term commitment to the project that will be continuous
over many years.
Preliminary work identified that, in existing systems describing and
classifying nursing practice, little of the material describes primary
health care nursing and community-oriented practice. ICN believed that
one way to fill this gap was to find approaches which will draw on
the knowledge and experiences of nurses practising in these settings,
nurses who are capable of describing what nurses do when providing
community-based nursing programmes and primary health care (PHC) oriented
nursing services to individuals, families, and the community. The meeting
in Tlaxcala set out to identify the feasibility of such an approach
and to explore strategies for drawing on the experience of practising
nurses.
One of the discoveries of the Tlaxcala meeting was that nurses present
were able to describe a number of attempts to label and classify nursing
activities. They also agreed that any published classification systems
they attempted to use were of limited value for PHC because their focus
was largely individual and problem oriented and closely attached to
tertiary care frameworks. Family and community oriented material was
rarely available in current classification systems or literature. Few
examples of terms, which related to strengths that need supporting
in order to enhance health levels, were available.
The meeting confirmed that nurses can identify nursing labels. Moreover
participants were convinced that without a language to describe nursing
activities it was likely that health systems would strongly reflect
only medical and political priorities. Issues related to PHC which
nurses address in their everyday work may be poorly represented or
absent.
Participants went on to identify that about 20% of what nurses do
is recorded somewhere in a general health information system. However
that 20% is mostly of a technical nature (e.g. immunisation, weighing,
dressings), and excludes much of the work which is often nursing's
special responsibility e.g. teaching, counselling, community mobilisation,
family guidance, training education and supervision of other health
workers etc. Therefore, what is recorded provides a false picture of
the actual and potential contribution of nursing to PHC. Consequently
this has had an impact on the way health priorities are set, policies
are developed, resources allocated, services planned, the selection
of content for nursing education programmes and the kind of topics
researchers study.
The outcomes of the Tlaxcala meeting enabled ICN to identify a number
of strategies to ensure that an International Classification for Nursing
Practice (ICNP® ) includes the
full range of PHC terms. Therefore, building on the enthusiasm and
commitment generated at the W. K. Kellogg Foundation sponsored meeting
in ICN proposed to continue to work with groups from countries represented
at that meeting: